"... and you Sir, are no Ronald Reagan!"

B. Hussein actually had the audacity to compare himself to Ronald Reagan. Hey, I don't make this stuff up. While the Republicans are falling all over themselves to proove they are the heir-apparent to the Reagan Revolution, this guy (who a bi-partisan evaluation showed to be even more liberal than Hillary!) brings up our beloved Gipper.

Here's an excerpt from Ben Smith's article at politico.com:

Obama, in his interview with the Reno Gazette-Journal's editorial board, made the case that his movement is as much about a national moment as about him as a "singular" individual, and he drew a rather odd analogy for a Democrat: Ronald Reagan.

"Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not, and a way that Bill Clinton did not," he said, describing Reagan as appealing to a sentiment that, "We want clarity, we want optimism, we want a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing."

Later, he also compared the moment, in passing, to the one that produced President Kennedy.

I'm sorry Mr. Obama, but you're forgetting one important thing that Americans wanted with Reagan: CONSERVATIVISM To want someone who solely has clarity, optimism, and is charismatic is paramount to Adolph Hitler's rise to power. SUBSTANCE MATTERS (hey, that's a good bumper sticker) Obama just doesn't understand that.

I read recently that Obama has been in the Senate for 3 years and has only been slightly involved with one piece of legislation while essentially running for president during those 3 years. During his previous time in the Illinois legislature, he had the bizarre habit of voting "present" instead of yay or nay on bills. Is it that he doesn't know how to vote or he knows very well how to vote but doesn't want us to know?

Scary man.